We also know that there was a Justinian Hingston who was married in Dorset in 1591, and the name seems to have been passed down through several generations in Weymouth/Melcombe Regis area. We also know that there was a Justinian Hingston of Rotherhithe who was a mariner and owner of a ship Josepha in 1761.
This document lists what we know; it assumes that these three Justinian's are linked but is highly speculative. It is hoped that it will serve as a framework for further research. It should not be regarded as definitive. If we find for certain that we can link in to other trees I will amend them in due course.
I have had considerable help from Ray Perrault, David Cotcher and Jane Oakley Sweet for which I am very grateful. Any mistakes in the compilation are mine. The discussion is listed on the Hingston Genealogy groups.io page.
We have long known that there were a small number of Hingstons in Dorset, but I have never tried to follow the line.
Stoate's listing of the Dorset Tudor Subsidy 1523-1593, which is the closest thing we have to a census, contains no references to Hingstons, but there are some Kingeston entries. Most are inland, but in 1545, at Preston, which is on the coast a couple of miles from Weymouth, the list includes a John Kyngeston, valued at £4 in goods, and William Kyngeston, valued at £2 in goods. These may be mistranscriptions and related to the family listed below, but they could also be a completely different family.
It is notable that the three families listed here all had a big gap between the marriages and the birth of the first known child. This could mean that they had other children elsewhere and those records are missing or have not been found, or it could be because the Anglo-Spanish war (of which the Spanish Armada was a part) was underway at the time and men from a port such as Melcombe might have been away.
There is good evidence for the existence of E. Thomas Hingston who would have been born in the 1590s. He has been included below in the children of C. Justinian but he could also be the son of his brother B. John.
B. JOHN HINGSTON was married at Melcombe on 28 Jul 1589 to ELIZABETH SAMWAIES. He would have been born in the 1560s. He may have been a butcher; an article in "The reliquary and illustrated archaeologist" Vol XII, Jan 1907 on bull rings and bull baiting refers to the idea that bulls killed during baiting were of better quality and says "at Weymouth a special detective seems to have been kept to spy upon the local butchers for according to The Encyclopaedia of Sport in 1618 one Edward Hardy, butcher, one of the searchers sworn and appointed for the viewing and searching of corrupt flesh killed within borough and towne, sayeth and presented upon his said oath that John Hingston, butcher there, upon Friday, being the fourteenth day of this instant monthe (August), did kill a bull unbaited, and did put the flesh thereof unto sale, and thereupon he is amerced by Mr. Mayor at iijs. iijd. In 1646 another member of the same family, Justinian Hingston, was fined for the same offence." Note that John is being fined for not subjecting his bulls to baiting. John may have had a son:-C. JUSTINIAN HINCKSON. Justinian seems to have been a butcher. The local court report on 27 Jun 1618, said "Maximilian Loader, one of the 'searchers of corrupte flesh' that Mr Justinian Hingston 'his boys' offered for sale 'oxe fleshe which died of itt sealfe'. It was ordered to be 'given unto doggs'."
The court minute book reports for 3 and 4 Feb 1618 also refer to Justinian. "W. Smith, Hellyer {=roofer}, on the shore towards Sutton 'against Tems Well' found a dead body. Turning 'towards the highwaye upon the hill,' he saw three men, who helped to draw the corpse to shore. J. {B. John?} and Justinian Hingston and Francis Warren the three men above-mentioned, say that they found in the dead man's pockets only a pair of gloves and 'certain ffossetts.' But at a little distance from the corpse they found a hat, 'a bonde to weare about the necke,' a staff, knife, and a double purse, containing a piece of gold of 11s., and about 6s. in silver. This money J. Hingston kept and they hid the purse 'in the Chessell {=shingle}'
Inquisitio (Inquest) about the death of W. Roberts. On evidence which does not appear, the verdict is that he 'feloniously immersed and murdered himself'. Tems Well is described as within the liberty and precincts of the Borough."
There appear to be two families in succession born to a Justinian but we only know of one man of that name at that time so it is assumed he married twice. He was probably born towards the end of the 1560s and this reading requires that he was having children until he was 70. He is probably the Justinian buried at Melcombe on 2 Jun 1640.
Justinian married firstly MARGARET CHUNE on 19 Jan 1591/2 at Radipole. Their had a number of children who would have been born between 1592 and the 1615, which seem to include:-
Justinian probably married secondly TEMPERANCE FALTIS on 31 Aug 1622 at Melcombe Regis. If this is the same man he would have been in his 50s at his second marriage and died in his 70s. If different, he would probably have been born in the 1590s, and could be a son of B. John. This is probably the Justinian who was buried 2 June 1640 at Melcombe. The following children of a Justinian could be children of this marriage:-
G. WILLIAM HINGSTON, married on 8 Aug 1601 at Melcombe CHRISTIAN ADAMS. They had at least one child:-
This is the generation of men most likely to have sworn the 1642 Protestation Oath. In May 1641, reacting to anxiety that the Protestant reformation was in danger of being undone, a 10-man committee of the House of Commons, in the Long Parliament, was appointed to draft a national declaration. On 18 January 1642 (New Style), the speaker of the House of Commons ordered that all males above the age of 18 were asked to sign the declaration and to swear the oath to the Protestant religion. In each parish, their names were inscribed in a list and sent back to parliament. Typically a local official wrote out all the names. The idea was that those that refused to take the oath would be presumed to be Catholics and so unfit to hold office in Church or state. In fact it was not a particularly effective way of distinguishing Catholics from Protestants, as in some areas Catholics took the oath with reservations concerning their religion, and others that were known from recusancy lists, appeared on the returns. The oath precedes, by a few months, the outbreak of the Civil War. Copies of the original lists can be downloaded. The list for Melcombe Regis includes the names of John Hingston (probably J.John below), Thomas Hingston (probably E.Thomas below) and Justmen (sic - a misreading of Justinian?) Hingston; who is he? We believe C.Justinian was buried in 1640 and D.Justinian wasn't born until 1633. The document is dated 1641 and the pages are badly damaged at the edges so many names are missing. Note that if HN4. James was born in 1627, as we suspect, he would have been too young to have made the declaration. I could not find any other Hingstons in neighbouring Radipole, Weymouth or any of the other nearby parishes.
J. JOHN HINGSTON married Mary and they had (both parents named):-E. THOMAS HINGSTON There is a lot of uncertainty about Thomas. We don't know when he was born nor who his parents were, but there are a total of twelve children born between 1617 and 1658 to a Thomas Hingston. E. Thomas was married around 1615, so born ca 1590, which makes him too young to be a child of A. Thomas, but of the right age to be A. Thomas’s grandson. He could be the son of any of B. John or C. Justinian but too early to be a son of G. William. The children fall into two groups; seven 1617-1634 and five 1649-1658. They may be the product of two marriages for one man, but there is a Thomas in the first group who may be the father of the second group. There are two known burials of a Thomas, one on 27 Jan 1627 and one on 7 May 1652, both probably of an adult (they do not say "Thomas the son of ..."). It is assumed here that the first seven children are E. Thomas' while the second five are his grandchildren, but this may be incorrect.
The children of Thomas probably include:-
There seem to have been other Justinians in Melcombe. There was a Justinian Bagg who married Amy Bond in 1619 at Melcombe.
There was a Justinian Hingston who married Mary Brion 1712, Astley Abbots, Shropshire. Questions. Who could this be? I know of no other Hingstons in Shropshire.
HN#4. Major JAMES HINGSTON (copied from Tree HN). It is clear that there was a Major James Hingston, who fought in the English Civil War on the Parliamentary side, but I have seen no evidence of who his parents were. He is 202 in WEH who says that he was a Major in the Army under Cromwell, Charles II and William III and saw service in Ireland and Flanders. (Question. Is there any evidence James fought in William's army? If so, is it the same James?) His dates are critical to the discussion. Cromwell invaded Ireland in 1649. If James was an officer in that army he must have been at least 20, so he must have been born before 1629. But William did not became King of England until the "Glorious Revolution" in 1688 and the Nine Years War went on from then until 1697. If James was born in 1629 he would have been 59 in 1688, which is probably quite old to be on active service, so he cannot have been born much before the mid 1620s. He could fit in as the son of someone in Generation 2, or possibly E.Thomas in this generation.(NB No such link has been found!).
In Tree HN his children are shown to include:-
K. THOMAS HINGSTON, baptised 5 Oct 1625 at Melcombe, the son of F. Thomas. There is the possibility that the following children are from a second marriage of F. Thomas, which would make them half-siblings of K. Thomas, rather than his children. No relevant marriages or burials have been found that would be needed to resolve this. The children of Thomas and his second wife would include:-
We now believe that James married twice, which disagrees with what has previously been shown on this site. It is likely that he is the James who married MARY BOWLES in 1679 (as shown in the Cork Marriage Licences), and subsequently married HELEN MORLEY, daughter of Alderman John Morley of Cork, who was Mayor of the City in 1718 and proprietor of Morley Lane and Fishamble Lane (now Liberty St) in the Parish of St Peter. WEH and other records only show him marrying Helen.
James children include:-
The Index of Exchequer Bills for 1730 (from Crossle's genealogical abstracts collection (FMP) File: Moore.
37a. James Justinian Hingston minor by John Morley ald {alderman?}, John Morley & Treseain ux{?} (Richard Moore) & Mary Eason widow {Eason widow is crossed out but "sic" written above which I take to mean that the original was correct} his uncle {?} and John Hingston (Thos Cromingham, James Leomn, Wm. Hurly, John Whitley, John Hare, Wm Sweet, Jane Mitchel and Edward Bridges) Roll 21 May 1730/ Mr{?} Hingston 17 Nov 1730/ Mr Jas Hemm, Wm Healy, John Whitty, John Hare, Wm Sweet, Jane Mitchel, Ed Brdiges 19 May 1731/ Roll amended 17 July 1730 by order of/Roll amended 3 Feb 1730 by order of.
Questions. There are several things I don't understand about this, apart from the fact that I can't read all the names clearly. If James Justinian was a minor in 1730 he was born after 1709, which is later than I suggested above. If so, is it the same man? F. James Justinian Hingstons maternal grandfather was Alderman John Morley, which fits, but who was John Hingston? There was HN#48 John Hingston, JJH's nephew, but we believe he was born ~1714 so would also have been a minor.
On 5 May 1740 James Justinian Hingston married Mary Shepherd at St. Mary Redcliffe, Bristol. She was apparently the daughter of a Lawyer but was orphaned and was brought up by "a grandmother" (note, not "her grandmother"). A deed for James Justinian Hingston and his wife Mary 1741 (Vol. 103 pg. 545 no. 72458) says that James Justinian Hingston of the City of Bristol is a grandson of James Hingston late of the City of Corke, and a “devisee” in the will of said James Hingston. There are several more deeds for this James Justinian Hingston for land in Cork.
James Justinian and Mary had one son:-
Questions. What happened subsequently; how was Mary's case resolved? Did she die on the Isle of Man? If not, where did she go? Did she ever get reunited with her son? I have written this document on the assumption that the James Justinian Hingston referred to here is the same person as the Justinian Hingston, son of HN#6 James Hingston, and that he was known by his second name to distinguish him from his father. Is that reasonable?
(Full scanned copies of the Ireland Registry of Deeds 1708 to 1929 can be viewed at https://www.familysearch.org/search/catalog/185720). Question. Can anyone access these deeds? They seem to contain a lot of relevant information.
"If the widow of the late Mr. JUSTINIAN HINGSTON, who lived in Bristol about four or five years since, and is now supposed to reside in the Isle of Man or Dublin, will direct a Letter to Mr. Joseph Bennett, Attorney, Daunt's Bridge, Corke, informing her of her Place of residence, she will hear of Something to her Advantage. Corke, August 12, 1778."
Questions. There seem to be Justinians in Cork, Bristol and Rotherhithe but as a mariner they could be the same man. Is that correct? There are several marriages here, spread over several years; was Justinian unlucky in his choice of wives or did he have a wife in every port? Considering how James Justinian treated Mary I would not put it past him.
Return to Hingston One-Name Study
Updated 2nd April 2023, C J Burgoyne